|
Faith in Public Life Series
Faith in Public Life
New political organization fights traditional morality By Stephanie Block
If you place any faith in
God, the following may interest you. Faith in Public Life,
the name of a fledgling coalition, is a double entendre: it could
mean taking ones spiritual and moral values out into the public
arena. Or, it could mean that ones faith ones hopes and
dreams rests in the domain of public life.
In the latter view, one
really needs very little faith in God. Religious institutions are
understood primarily as social goods, as places for community
building and the nurturing of social skills. As such, they are
useful tools in the political struggle for power and influence.
Such a view doesnt disallow for the spiritual dimension of
religion but relegates it to a strictly private place.
Within the new organization,
Faith in Public Life, one will no doubt find people from both
camps. The organization itself, however, understands its
mission in
the second sense. Its website (
www.faithinpubliclife.org
)
explains that its founding was sparked by the 2004 elections to
support what it calls the social justice faith movement and
develop increased and effective collaboration, coordination, and
communication on the national, state and local level. It says:
We have faith in public
life. In other
words, we have faith in the positive and significant role that faith
should play in public life, and we have faith that public life will
support justice and the common good. We believe the positive role
for faith in public life is fulfilled when: (1) religious voices for
justice and the common good impact public discourse and policies;
and (2) those who use religion as a tool of division and exclusion
do not dominate public debate. We also believe faithful
contributions to public life should not, and need not, violate
Americas central tenet of separation of church and state.
What, then, does Faith in
Public Life understand by the social justice faith movement?
Faith in Public Life
first explains what the movement isn't: it isn't
addressing what it dubs the Religious Rights issues
of abortion and homosexuality. Faith in Public Life issues, by
contrast, are social and economic justice.
Now, one might think were
talking compatible and complimentary concerns, as if the politics of
the right is exclusively concerned with the protection of vulnerable
human life while the politics of the left is concerned about a high
standard of living for all. If that were the case, right and left
are allies not enemies. Both would be working toward the common
good.
Faith in Public Life
is clear that this is not
the case. To take the issue of isn't: of the 2470 organizations around the US with
an affiliation to Faith in Public Life, 150 have gay rights
as a primary policy focus. Thirty-seven of those are Roman Catholic
dissident factions - Call to Action groups - many of which
are Dignity chapters that have changing the Roman Catholic
Churchs moral teachings about homosexuality as their express
ambition.
Thus, the Catholic Church and Faith in
Public Life are working at cross purposes. Advocates of
same-sex marriage and other public policy legislation that would
make isn'ta protected lifestyle are at utter odds with a
religious faith that teaches homosexual behavior is a sin.
The Catholic Church is not
the only target of these change agents. Similar clusters of
homosexual advocates target other faiths. For example, there are
four, local Integrity groups affiliated with Faith in
Public Life. Integrity operates in mainline Protestant
denominations much the same way Dignity operates in the
Catholic Church.
In the case of abortion, Call to Action
has promoted reproductive choice and family planning since its
inception in the 70s. Its presence and the presence of other groups
(see, for example, the public affairs policy of Faith in Public
Life member National Council of Jewish Women Austin chapter)
who have, as their political agenda, those particular issues as
their defining characteristic means that Faith in Public Life
also is supportive of abortion and contraception. While the Church
teaches that abortion is murder, Faith in Public Life is
coordinating a national collaboration to assure, among other things,
that pro-abortion politicians are elected. In an Orwellian bit of
newspeak, the right to legally murder ones unborn children
is social and economic justice. Social justice used to
mean a social awareness of, and care for, the poor and vulnerable -
within the boundaries of justice, rendering to each man his due
because of his dignity as a man, in the image and likeness of God.
The current misuse of the term isn
't simply ambiguous. Its
a thought-terminating cliché: just tell Catholics that a certain
position, no matter how vile, is demanded by social justice and
who dares oppose it?
The most ironic aspect of
this is that Catholics, with a clear and deliberate mandate to fight
the secular culture of death, are assisting many of the Faith in
Public Life organizations through its so-called anti-poverty
collection, the Catholic Campaign for Human Development.
Among Faith in Public Life are hundreds of Alinsky-style,
broad-based community organizations and their networks, which
receive millions of dollars annually from the Catholic Campaign
for Human Development.
The Catholics arent the only pawns.
Other religions have their own funds: the Jewish Fund for Justice,
Americas Domestic Hunger Program of the Evangelical Lutheran
Church, Presbyterian Church USAs One Great Hour of Sharing Fund,
the Unitarian Universalist Veatch Program, the
Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist
Church, to name a few. Together, they are
supporting many of the organizations that make up Faith in Public
Life.
The magnitude of this
networking of leftwing organizations, in the name of religion, is
difficult to comprehend. The names are legion and they mutate
faster than bacteria. An organization like Faith in Public Life,
however, gives the observer some insight into what has been
constructed through the resources of churches, synagogues, and
mosques - and the end toward which they strive. Ï
|